1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 902 of 2025 • Smt. Khusboo Sharma D/o Shri Prahlad Sharma, W/o Shri Ujjwal Pandey Aged About 29 Years R/o House No. G-19 Rishab South City Durg, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. Prahlad Sharma S/o Late Rajaram Sharma Aged About 56 Years R/o Ramanujganj Naka, Near Forest Barier, Near Sanjay Park Nagar- Ambikapur, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 2. Shubham Sharma S/o Prahlad Sharma Aged About 28 Years R/o Ramanujganj Naka, Near Forest Barier, Near Sanjay Park Nagar- Ambikapur, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 3. Shivam Sharma S/o Prahlad Sharma Aged About 23 Years R/o Ramanujganj Naka, Near Forest Barier, Near Sanjay Park Nagar- Ambikapur, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 4. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Sarguja Ambikapur, Chhattisgarh 5. Sanjay Jaiswal S/o Sonalal Jaiswal Aged About 49 Years Caste Kalar, R/o Bouripara, Ambikapur Police Station And Tahsil Ambikapur, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 6. Sunita Jaiswal W/o Shatrughan Prasad Jaiswal Aged About 45 Years Caste Kalar R/o Village Markadand Post Narsinghpur Police Station And Tahsil Rajpur, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 7. Smt. Suman Dubey W/o Mukesh Dubey Aged About 32 Years Caste Bramhin, R/o Bouripara (Near Shikari Road) Nagar Ambikapur, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 8. Jayprakash Gupta S/o Ramlakhan Sao Aged About 48 Years Caste Teli R/o Chaki Police Station And Tahsil Ramanujganj, District Balrampur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Qamrul Aziz, Advocate For State : Ms. Neelima Singh Thakur, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 11. 09.2025 SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2025.09.11 18:09:17 +0530 2 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that an application moved by the petitioner/plaintiff under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of CPC has already been decided by the learned trial Court. He would pray that a direction may bee issued to the learned trial Court to expedite the trial. 2. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State would oppose. 3. Considering the fact that Civil Suit No. 219 A/2023 is pending since 12.07.2023; therefore, the learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. 4. With the aforesaid observation(s), and direction(s), the instant petition is hereby disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge $iddhant