Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42513 (AP)

Nasika Kalyani v. Sri Pravin Kumar

CC/1340/2021 · 2025-12-07

D Ramesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010278842021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1340/2021 Between: 1. NASIKA KALYANI, W/O LEELA KUMAR, AGED 40 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O NEAR KANYAKAPARAMESWARI TEMPLE, RAVURI ROAD, DESAIPETA PANCHAYAT, VETAPALEM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI PRAVIN KUMAR, IAS, S/O NOT KNOWN, DISTRICT COLLECTOR 86 DISTRICT MAGISTRATE. ONGOLE DISTRICT, ONGOLE 2. M PRABHAKAR REDDY, , S/O NOT KNOWN, THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHIRALA, PRAKASA DISTRICT 3. LINGAM MAHESWAR RAO, , S/O NON KNOWN, THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, VETAPALEM MANDAL, CHIRALA ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the contemnors herein for their and deliberate and willful act of disobedience of the Honorable Court orders in WP No. 10189 of 2020 dated 23.06.2020 in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P RAMA SHARANA SHARMA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. G L NAGESWAR RAO The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO:1340 OF 2021 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, has submitted that the orders dt.23.06.2020 in W.P. No.10189 of 2020 have been implemented and hence, no further orders are required in this contempt case. 2. Recording the same, the contempt case is closed. No costs. 3. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this contempt case shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Dt.08.12.2025 BV