APHC010184432022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10838/2022 Between: 1. LANKA VENKATA RAMA RAO, S/O. LAKSHMANA SWAMY, AGED 55 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 15-31-64/1, DHARMA REDDY COLONY, PHASE- 1, BESIDE ICICI BANK, KUKATPALLY HOUSING BOARD COLONY, KUKATPALLY, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE. 2. LANKA TARUN, S/O. LANKA VENKATA RAMA RAO, AGED 29 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 15-31-64/1, DHARMA REDDY COLONY, PHASE- 1, BESIDE ICICI BANK, KUKATPALLY HOUSING BOARD COLONY, KUKATPALLY, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE. 3. LANKA VENKATA SAI SREEHARSHA, S/O. LANKA VENKATA RAMA RAO, AGED 23 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 15-31-64/1, DHARMA REDDY COLONY, PHASE-1, BESIDE ICICI BANK, KUKATPALLY HOUSING BOARD COLONY, KUKATPALLY, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. CRIME INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT, MANGALAGIRI POLICE STATION, ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GUNTUR-522004, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SIDDI SRINIVAS RAO, S/O STLSV PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 50 2 YEARS, OCC. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE, R/O 43-119-24, MASJID ROAD, AJITH SINGH NAGAR, NEAR SHUBODAYA SCHOOL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 4. SIDDI GIRISH BABU, S/O SIDDI VEERA BRAHMACHARULU AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, OCC. RETIRED FROM SERVICE, R/O 5-2A, ANUMALIPETA, VETAPALEM, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 5. GUTTIKONDA SRAVAN NAGA SHEKAR, S/O GUTTIKONDA BHOGI KOTESHWARA PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCCUPATION. PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O PLOT NO 355, RAGHAVENDRA COLONY, BERAMGUDA, AMEENPUR, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA 6. SIDDI PADMINI BAI, W/O KAJANA RAMA KRISHNA PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCC. GOVERNMENT SERVICE, R/O 26-24- 33/6A, AT AGRAHARAM, 8TH LINE, LAST NEAR SBI, GUNTUR, 522008 7. SIDDI VENKATA RAMANA BABY, W/O LATE SWARNA JANARDHAN RAO AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCCUPATION. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE, R/O 26-34-33/6A, AT AGRAHARAM, 8TH LINE, LAST NEAR SBI, GUNTUR, 522008 8. PALLE RAMESH GOUD, S / O PALLE BAL RAJ GOUD, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O 4-76, MACHAREDDY MANDAL, FARIDPET, NIZAMABAD, TELANGANA. 9. MANTHENA RAVI VARMA RAJU, S/O MANTHENA VENKATA RAMA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O FLAT NO 702, SHREYA TOWERS, NEAR VENSAI PROJECTS, KOMPALLY, MEDCHAL MALKAJGIRI DISTRICT, TELANGANA ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus, or direction declaring the arbitrary, highhanded, brutal and transgressing acts of the 2nd respondent herein in interfering with civil disputes and detaining the petitioners in their police station (Hyderabad Branch) for more than 10 hours on 10/04/2022 and also insisting the petitioners to handover the original will dated 14/08/2014 and original sale deed dated 24/06/1993 vide Document No.5356/1993 to the 3rd to 9th respondents herein and also insisting the 1st 3 petitioner to withdraw 0.S.No.144 of 2022 on the file of Additional Senior Civil Judge Court, Kukatpally, Hyderabad, Telangana State and declare the same as illegal, arbitrary, unwarranted, in violation of the Article 14, 19, 20 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequentially direct the respondents herein not to interfere with the peaceful living of the petitioner by calling the petitioners to the police station and detaining the petitioners for long hours, without any authority under law and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent herein not to interfere with the peaceful living of the petitioners and their family members by taking them into unlawful custody and detaining them for long hours, without any authority under law, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition before this Honourable Court. IA NO: 2 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent herein not to insist the petitioners to produce and handover the original copy of the original will deed dated 14/08/2014 and sale deed dated 24/06/1993 vide Document No.5356/1993 or any other connected document pertaining to 0.S.No.144/2022 on the file of Honorable Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kukkatpally, Hyderabad City, Telangana State, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition before this Honourable Court. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KILARU NITHIN KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10838 of 2022 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue an order, more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus, or direction declaring the arbitrary, highhanded, brutal and transgressing acts of the 2nd respondent herein in interfering with civil disputes and detaining the petitioners in their police station (Hyderabad Branch) for more than 10 hours on 10/04/2022 and also insisting the petitioners to handover the original will dated 14/08/2014 and original sale deed dated 24/06/1993 vide Document No.5356/1993 to the 3rd to 9th respondents herein and also insisting the 1st petitioner to withdraw 0.S.No.144 of 2022 on the file of Additional Senior Civil Judge Court, Kukatpally, Hyderabad, Telangana State and declare the same as illegal, arbitrary, unwarranted, in violation of the Article 14, 19, 20 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequentially direct the respondents herein not to interfere with the peaceful living of the petitioner by calling the petitioners to the police station and detaining the petitioners for long hours, without any authority under law and pass such.…” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Kilaru Nithin Krishna, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that no further Orders are required in this matter and the petition may be disposed of. 3. Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the official respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 5 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 06.11.2025. UPS 6 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.10838 of 2022 Dated.06.11.2025 UPS 181