Mutyala venkateswara Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/30723/2021 · 2025-10-28
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42503 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42503 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010513602021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 30723 OF 2021 Between:
1. Mutyala venkateswara Rao, S/o Narayana Rao Aged 55 years Occ- properties and cultivation, R/o. Ramanagaram, Challapalli Mandal Avanigadda, Krishna District. ...Petitioner AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, at Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. 3. The Station House Officer, Challapalli Police Station, Challapalli, Krishna District. 4. The District Collector, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. 5. The Tahsildhar, Challapalli Mandal Krishna District. 6. The VRO Ramanagaram, Challapalli Mandal, Krishna District. 7. Sri Sandeep, S/o. Not know Occ- Working as The Sub Inspector, Challapalli Police Station, Challapalli, Krishna District. 8. Kota Naga Lakshmi, W/o. Late Sreenivasa Rao Aged 50 years Occ- housewife, R/o. 8th ward, Challapalli Village and Mandal, Krishna District. 9. Mutyala srinivasa Rao, S/oLate Narayana Rao Aged 49 years Occ- Cultivation, R/o. Ramanagaram, Challapalli Mandal, Avanigadda, Krishna District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue writ or direction preferably Writ o Mandamus declaring the action of the 7th respondent in interfering iito the civil disputes and calling the petitioners to the Police Station frequently and harassing him to settle the civil dispute which is illegal, improper, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 19 (1) (e) and 21 of Constitution of India.
Consequentially direct the respondents 2 to 5 to consider my representation dt 01-11-2021 inview of 6th and 7th respondent who misusing their statutory powers for their personal use and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 7th respondent not to interfere into the civil disputes and not to harassing the petitioner by calling him to Police Station frequently, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: KALLA TULASI DURGAMBA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order:
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 30723 OF 2021
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…pleased to issue writ or direction preferably Writ o Mandamus declaring the action of the 7th respondent in interfering iito the civil disputes and calling the petitioners to the Police Station frequently and harassing him to settle the civil dispute which is illegal, improper, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 19 (1) (e) and 21 of Constitution of India. Consequentially direct the respondents 2 to 5 to consider my representation dt 01-11-2021 inview of 6th and 7th respondent who misusing their statutory powers for their personal use and pass..…”
2. Heard Sri Kalla Tulasi Durgamba, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.
3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties.
4. Recording the same, this writ petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil dispute between the parties except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Dated 29.10.2025 KKV
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
108
WRIT PETITION NO: 30723 OF 2021
Dated 29.10.2025 KKV
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO.: W.P.No.30723 of 2021 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date
ORDER OFFICE NOTE
1
29.10.2025
Dr.VJP,J
The Writ Petition is disposed of.
(Vide separate order)
________ Dr.VJP, J KKV