[2025:RJ-JP:51725] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15185/2025 Abhishek Meena S/o Mukesh Chand Meena, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Tond, Police Station Malarna Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta with Mr. Utkarsh Goyal, Ms. Chanchal and Mr. Lokendra Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP Mr. Mukesh Kumar Goyal for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 19/12/2025 1. This criminal miscellaneous bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 in respect of FIR No.595/2024 registered at Police Station Lalsot, District Dausa for the offences punishable under Sections 125(a), 281 and 106(1) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR has been lodged only on account of an incident which took place due to inadvertence and without there being any mens rea. Learned counsel submits that other co-accused namely; Pradeep Sharma, Pintu, Ramlakhan, Mahendra Meena, Child in conflict with law 'X', who have arrested, have already been enlarged on bail by orders passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide orders [2025:RJ-JP:51725] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-15185/2025] dated 13.11.2025, 13.10.2025, 26.06.2025, 13.02.2025, 26.08.2025 respecitvely passed in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application Nos.14702/2025, 130095/2025, 7693/2025, 1386/2025, 612/2025 respectively. Learned counsel further submits that subsequent to lodging of the FIR, even claim petition has been filed by the legal representatives of the deceased and the complainant has also entered into compromise with the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the complainant is present in person before the Court and he does not dispute that the death has taken place on account of accident for which claim petition has already been filed and he expresses no objection, in case, benefit of anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioner. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed this anticipatory bail application. 5. In the light of the fact that the complainant himself has come out with the facts that the death has taken place on account of accident for which claim petition has already been filed and looking to the fact that other co-accused, who have arrested pursuant to FIR in question, have already been enlarged on regular bail. This Court deems it just and proper to grant the petitioner the same. 6. The Anticipatory Bail Application is hereby allowed. The S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Authority, Police Station Lalsot, District Dausa in F.I.R. No. 595/2024 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with [2025:RJ-JP:51725] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-15185/2025] two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to his satisfaction on the following conditions (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /6