On 04.11.2025, this Court had passed the foll “Learned counsel submits that FIR has been filed on the complaint of Sarpanch of Bhagowal, that theft of 100 ft. Wires from the motor along with wires of some submersible pump, has been committed in Adamwal and the petitioner’s of disclosure statement of co There is delay of 7 days in lodging the FIR. The petitioner is ready and willing to join the required by the investigating agency and will co Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court Ms. Gagandeep Kaur, DAG Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondent Meanwhile the petitioner is directed to join the investigation on or before 14.11.2025. In the event of his arrest, he shall be released on satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to , this Court had passed the following order:- Learned counsel submits that FIR has been filed on complaint of Sarpanch of Bhagowal, that theft of 100 motor along with wires of some submersible pump, has been committed in other village Adamwal and the petitioner’s name surfaced on the basis disclosure statement of co-accused Suddan @ Gulu. in lodging the FIR. The petitioner is ready and willing to join the investigation as and when required by the investigating agency and will co-operate. At the asking of the Court Ms. Gagandeep Kaur, DAG accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State. Meanwhile the petitioner is directed to join the or before 14.11.2025. In the event of his eased on interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to compliance PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.02.06 16:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. of conditions as enshrined under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023. However, it is clarified that if the petitioner does not join and co-operate with the Investigating Agency as required by the Arresting/Investigating Officer, this interim order shall be deemed to have been vacated. Adjourned to 16.12.2025.” 3. Learned counsel submits that in pursuance of the afore- mentioned order, the petitioner has not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the investigating agency requires the petitioner to appear, he shall make himself available without demur. 4. Learned State counsel on instructions from SI Satnam Singh affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioner and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioner is not required for further custodial interrogation. 5. In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner is allowed and the order dated 04.11.2025 granting interim bail to him, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023. 6. However, it is made clear that if the petitioner fails to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to him. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.02.06 16:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.