AJMER HUSAIN ASHAD ALI BARBHUYYA v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
BA/3456/2025 · 2025-10-15
Shri Shivkumar Dige
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42499 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42499 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
910-BA-3456-2025 (CR) .docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3456 OF 2025 Ajmer Husain Ashad Ali Barbhuyya ...Applicant Versus The State Of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr. Aarya Ambulkar a/e. Adv. Vivekanand Dubey i/b. Adv. Rakesh Bhatkar, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms. A. A. Takalkar, APP for the State-Respondent.
CORAM :
SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE :
15 OCTOBER 2025 P.C.:
1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State.
2. The learned advocate for the applicant submits that during the pendency of this application, the charge-sheet has been filed. Hence, the learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this application with liberty to file fresh application before the learned Sessions Court. 1/2 ADN
910-BA-3456-2025 (CR) .docx
3. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant, the application is allowed to be withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. If a fresh bail application is filed by the applicant, the learned Trial Court shall decide the same on its own merits.
4. Bail Application is dismissed and disposed of as withdrawn.
[SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.] 2/2 ADN