Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42498 (RAJ)

PRADEEP SINGH S/O SHRI GULAB SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/13669/2025 · 2025-10-17

Anand Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:42682] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13669/2025 Pradeep Singh S/o Shri Gulab Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Sowaniya Malipura, P.s. Saket Nagar District Beawar. (Presently Lodged In District - Jail Beawar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 17/10/2025 1. This bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the accused- petitioner in respect of F.I.R. No. 105/2024 registered at Police Station Saket Nagar, District Beawar for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 474, 475 & 120B of IPC. 2. It is stated that petitioner has not been named in the FIR, however, during investigation he has been implicated only for the reason that, he is allegedly assisted co-accused-Kalu Singh for submitting application for grant of loan from bank, whereas the bank authorities conducted enquiry with regard to veracity and validity of the lease deed (Patta) belonging to co-accused Kalu Singh and on enquiry, it was found that the said lease deed (Patta) was forged. [2025:RJ-JP:42682] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13669/2025] 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitts that petitioner is neither the owner of the alleged Patta, nor has submitted any application for getting loan for himself, nor has been shown as guarantor in the loan application yet, without there being any basis and on mere suspicion, he has been implicated in the FIR. He is behind the bars since 07.10.2025 and he is not required for any further custodial interrogation. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. Considered the submissions made at Bar. 6. In light of the fact that the petitioner has not been named in the FIR as well as the fact that he is not the owner of the said plot in respect of which, the forged Patta is said have been issued, without making any comment over the merits of the case, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, the Bail Application is hereby allowed. The accused-petitioner Pradeep Singh S/o Shri Gulab Singh shall be released on bail in pursuance of F.I.R. No. 105/2024 registered at Police Station Saket Nagar, District Beawar on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- along with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each. That apart, the accused-petitioner shall also follow the conditions as under:- (i) He shall not tamper with any evidence, nor would influence the witnesses in the case. (ii) He shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court. [2025:RJ-JP:42682] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13669/2025] (iii) He shall co-operate in the trial and shall attend each and every date of hearing in the trial, until and unless his presence is exempted by the trial Court. 8. In case of failure of observance of the conditions, a ground for cancellation of bail would arise. (ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/287