Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42498 (PNJ)

USHA DEVI v. PSPCL AND OTHERS

CWP/9728/2024 · 2025-08-19

Suvir Sehgal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-9728-2024 -1- 249 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-9728-2024 Date of decision:-19.08.2025 Usha Devi ...Petitioner Versus Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present : None for the petitioner. Mr. M.S. Longia, Advocate and Mr. Saurabh Bahmani, Advocate for the respondents. **** SUVIR SEHGAL, J.(ORAL) 1. This writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the office letter memo No.1126 dated 01.04.2024, Annexure P9 and speaking order/office order No.41 dated 31.01.2022, Annexure P6. Further prayer has been made seeking direction to respondents to pay the compensation to the tune of Rs.50 lakhs along with 9% interest from the date of accident. 2. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Similar was the position on the previous three occasions. Counsel for the respondents points out that petitioner has failed to comply with order BRIJ MOHAN 2025.08.22 15:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh CWP-9728-2024 -2- 249 dated 06.05.2024 passed by this Court. Court has been informed that although a request was received for appearance of counsel for petitioner through the virtual mode, but counsel has not joined the proceedings. 3. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the petition. 4. Dismissed in default for non-prosecution. (SUVIR SEHGAL) 19.08.2025 JUDGE Brij Whether reasoned/speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No BRIJ MOHAN 2025.08.22 15:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh