Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42497 (BOM)

SHARAD SITARAM PATIL v. SHRI SIDHESHWAR SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL TURACHI THR PRESIDENT AND OTHERS

WP/11395/2025 · 2025-10-06

Sharmila U Deshmukh, Shri M S Karnik

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

3-WP-11395-2025.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 11395 OF 2025 Sharad Sitaram Patil … Petitioner Versus Shri Sidheshwar Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Turachi Thr President & Others … Respondents —————— Mr. Sachin Madhav Bhavar for the Petitioner. Mr. V. M. Mali, AGP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Satish Raut and Adv. Aarya V. Ambulkar for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. —————— Coram : M. S. Karnik & Sharmila U. Deshmukh, JJ. Date : October 6, 2025. P. C. : 1. Affidavit-in-reply filed by Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 is taken on record. 2. Learned Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2, on instructions, makes a statement that the proposal in terms of prayer clause (a) of the Petition will be submitted to the Education Officer (Secondary) within a period of 2 weeks from today. The statement is accepted. Shubham Talle 1 of 2 TALLE SHUBHAM ASHOKRAO Digitally signed by TALLE SHUBHAM ASHOKRAO Date: 2025.10.06 20:16:46 +0530 3-WP-11395-2025.doc 3. The proposal to be decided 10 weeks thereafter. If there are any deficiencies, the Education Officer (Secondary) to give an opportunity to Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to cure deficiencies. If the proposal is approved Shalarth ID be issued expeditiously by the Deputy Director of Education. 4. Writ Petition stands disposed of. [ Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. ] [ M. S. Karnik, J. ] Shubham Talle 2 of 2