APHC010583532024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 30484/2024 Between: 1. SAI KUMAR, S/O LOKANNA ACHARI, R/O.H.NO.2/103,PAGIDIRAI VILLAGE , TUGGALI MANDALAM, KURNOOL DT.A. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME DEPARTMENT),VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.A.P 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, OFFICE OF DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALGIRI, A.P 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,KURNOOL DISTRICT, A.P 4. THE SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, ADONI, KURNOOL DT, A.P 5. THE S H O OF III TOWN P S, ADONI, KURNOOL DT , A.P ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, Order or Direction more particularily one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not taking action On complaints made by the petitioner through his Counsel on 26.10.2023 to the 3rd, 4th, and 5th respondent is as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the guidelines issued by the apex court in Lalitha Kumari Vs State of UP apart from violation of Article 14,19 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to take appropriate action on the complaint dated 26.10.2023 and also intiate the departmental inquiry against the deliquent police officers named in my complaint dated 26/10/2023 and and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B R S KALYAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief: “ ... to issue Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not taking action On complaints made by the petitioner through his Counsel on 26.10.2023 to the respondents 3, 4, and 5 as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the guidelines issued by the apex court in Lalitha Kumari Vs State of UP apart from violation of Articles 14,19 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently, direct the respondents to take appropriate action on the complaint dated 26.10.2023 and also initiate the departmental inquiry against the delinquent police officers named in my complaint dated 26/10/2023 and to pass such ...” None represented for the Petitioner. Learned Assistant Government Pleader on instructions would submit that based on the Petitioner’s complaint, crime is registered and the matter is under investigation and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 04.12.2025 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 30484 of 2024 04.12.2025 Mjl /*