IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 210 CWP-10836-2019 Date of Decision: 15.02.2025 Brijesh Sharma …Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present:- None for the petitioner Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) As per office report, notice to the third respondent could not be issued for want of correct address. 2. On 20.08.2024, learned counsel for the petitioner was granted two weeks’ time to furnish correct address, but it was not done, and resultantly notice could not be issued. 3. There is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Dismissed for want of prosecution. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 15.02.2025 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PAYAL 2025.02.17 09:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document