Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42491 (RAJ)

YUVRAJ SINGH S/O ROHITASWA v. SECRETARY

CW/15902/2025 · 2025-10-17

Sanjeet Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:42604] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15902/2025 Yuvraj Singh S/o Rohitaswa, Aged About 17 Years, R/o Vpo Bhorki, Tehsil Gudhagorji District Jhunjhunu Minor Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Kalpna Kumari W/o Rohitaswa Aged About 40 Years R/o Vpo Bhorki, Tehsil Gudhagorji District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Secretary, Board Of Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Ajmer. 2. Headmaster, Sunrise Public Shikshan Sansthan, Todi, Jhunjhunu (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bharat Saini HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT Order 17/10/2025 1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “1. by an appropriate writ, order or direction the impugned action of respondent authority be quashed and set-aside and further the authority be directed to rectify the date of birth of the petitioner as 30.05.2008 instead of 30.05.2009. 2) By an appropriate writ, order or direction the concerned authority be directed to issue fresh marksheets and certificates of the petitioner with actual date of birth. 3) Any other appropriate order or directions which this Hon'ble Court considers expedient, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be granted in favor of the petitioner; and 4) Cost of this writ petition may kindly be awarded in favor of the humble petitioner. 2. By way of filing the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking the direction against the respondents for rectification of the petitioner's date of birth in the record of the school and respondent - Board. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the aforesaid purpose, an application was submitted before the respondent - Board on 05.08.2025, however, till date, no response has been issued by the [2025:RJ-JP:42604] (2 of 2) [CW-15902/2025] respondent - Board, hence, appropriate direction be issued to respondent - Board to decide the petitioner's application expeditiously. 4. Considering the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petition stands disposed of with expectations from the respondent - Board to decide the petitioner's application by passing a reasoned and speaking order, expeditiously as early as possible preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. 5. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SANJEET PUROHIT),J SAHIL SONI /9