APHC010411282023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21312/2023 Between: 1. SODE MAHESHWARA RAO, S/O LATE SODE PULLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O NARASINGAPET VILLAGE, KUNAVARAM MANDAL, ALLURI SEETHARAMA RAJU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ALLURI SEETHARAMA RAJU DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KUNAVARAM POLICE STATION, ALURI SEETHARAMA RAJU DISTRICT. 4. SODE SESHAMMA, W/O LATE BHADRAIAH, AGED 40 YEARS YEARS, R/O NARASINGAPET VILLAGE, KUNAVARAM MANDAL, ALLURI SEETHARAMA RAJU DISTRICT. 5. SODE KANNAIAH, S/ O LATE BHADRAIAH, AGED 25 YEARS, OCC . PRIVATE EMPLOYEE , R/O NARASINGAPET VILLAGE, KUNAVARAM MANDAL, ALLURI SEETHARAMA RAJU DISTRICT. 6. SODE SEETHAIAH, S/ O LATE BHADRAIAH, AGED 26 YEARS, OCC .PRIVATE EMPLOYEE , R/O NARASINGAPET VILLAGE, KUNAVARAM MANDAL, ALLURI SEETHARAMA RAJU DISTRICT. 7. SODE MUTTAIAH, S/O LATE BHADRAIAH, AGED 29 YEARS, OCC . PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O NARASINGAPET VILLAGE, KUNAVARAM MANDAL, ALLURI SEETHARAMA RAJU DISTRICT. 8. SODE DURGAPRASAD, S/O LATE KANNAIAH, AGED 22 YEARS, OCC . R.T.C DRIVER, R/O NARASINGAPET VILLAGE, KUNAVARAM MANDAL, ALLURI SEETHARAMA RAJU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the respondent No.3 in taking action against the unofficial respondents pursuant to the complaint dt. 11 -8-2023 followed by personal visits, as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent No.2 herein to take action against the unofficial respondents in accordance with Law, and to grant IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent No.2 herein to forthwith register the FIR against the unofficial respondents pursuant to the complaint dt. 11 -8-2023, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V BABY RANI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21312/2023 The Court made the following Order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the respondent No.3 in taking action against the unofficial respondents pursuant to the complaint dt. 11 -8-2023 followed by, as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent No.2 herein to take action against the unofficial respondents in accordance with Law, and to grant such other relief or reliefs…” 2. No representation for the petitioner. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri. V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on instructions, would submit that the petitioner himself had made a statement before the police, not to take any action on the compliant lodged by him. In that view of the matter, the police did not choose to proceed further in the matter. 4. Recording the above submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 04.12.2025 Ksj