Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:56749 Court No. - 69 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 2892 of 2025 Applicant :- Haneef Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Pandey,Sheshadri Trivedi,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J. 1. Sri K.N. Tripathi, Advocate has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of the informant, the same is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri K.N. Tripathi, learned counsel for the informant. Perused the material placed on record. 3. The present application has been filed with the prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant in Case Crime No.66 of 2025, under sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 316(2), 352, 351(2) and 351(3) B.N.S., P.S. Baradari, District Bareilly. 4. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case. The case is purely civil in nature. The applicant vide registered sale deed dated 4.12.2021 sold 100 sq. yards of land of Gata No. 253 situated at village Jagatpur Lala Begam, Bareilly in favour of the informant. The informant was placed under possession of the said plot and she constructed the boundary wall around the said plot. Reliance has also been placed on the report of the Sub- Inspector of Police Station Baradari, Bareilly addressed to the A.C.J.M-1st, Bareilly. Further, the co-accused Saleem Sultan, Intekhab and Km. Fareena have been granted anticipatory bail till submission of the police report by this court vide order dated 5.4.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application No.2262 of 2025. At this stage, there is no credible evidence against the applicant. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. It is next submitted that the investigation is going on and the applicant has apprehension of his arrest in the above mentioned case. 5. Learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 6. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the application for grant of anticipatory bail be confined only till the submission of police report. 7. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant, considering the nature of accusations and antecedents of the applicant, the fact that the case is purely civil in nature, the co-accused Saleem Sultan, Intekhab and Km. Fareena have been granted anticipatory bail till submission of the police report by this court, at this stage, there is no substantive evidence against the applicant, without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail till the submission of police report. 8. In the event of arrest, the applicant Haneef be released on anticipatory bail in the aforesaid case crime till the submission of police report, if any, under section 193 (3) Cr.P.C., on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport, the same shall be deposited by him before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned. 9. In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant. 10. The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation of the present case in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order independently without being prejudiced by any observation made by this Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail application of the applicant. 11. The applicant is directed to produce a copy of this order before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned within ten days from today, who shall ensure the compliance of present order. 12. The application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 17.4.2025 S.S. Digitally signed by :- SIDDHARTH SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad