223 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-18607-2025 Date of decision: 22.04.2025 Gurjot @ Manni ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. M.S. Kathuria, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Kamal Deep Sehra, Advocate for the complainant. HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking anticipatory bail in case bearing FIR No.148 dated 06.03.2025 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 191(3)/190/115(2)/109/351(2)(3)/126(2) of BNS registered at Police Station Yamuna Nagar City, District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana. Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that the perusal of the FIR (supra) clearly indicates that the petitioner has not given any specific injury on the person of the complainant on his head. He refers to the FIR (supra) and submits that co-accused, namely, Ram, has given an iron rod blow on the head of Zia Abbas. Thereafter, co-accused, namely, Honey, Raju and Nepali, picked up bricks from the spot and gave injuries on the head of Zia Abbas, as such, the petitioner cannot be held liable for the injuries which have been declared dangerous to life. Neha 2025.04.24 19:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-18607-2025 -2- Per contra, the learned State counsel assisted by learned counsel for the complainant submits that petitioner is the main accused and has acted in a premeditated and determined manner and petitioner has first of all held the complainant and forcibly put him in his car and, thereafter, when the mother of the complainant came forward to rescue him, the petitioner along with others have given her slap blows. In the present case, the injured, namely, Zia Abbas has not recovered till date and he went in coma and now he is bed ridden. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view role attributed to the petitioner in the present case, his custodial interrogation is required, therefore, no ground is made out to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner and thus, the present petition is hereby dismissed. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 22.04.2025 Neha Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Neha 2025.04.24 19:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document