Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42468 (AP)

TEGATI LOKESH, VISAKHAPATNAM & 4 OTHERS v. CHAIRMAN,NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF OPEN SCHOOL,NEW DELHI&2 OTHER

WP/30776/2014 · 2025-11-16

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010251532014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 30776/2014 Between: 1. TEGATI LOKESH, VISAKHAPATNAM & 4 OTHERS, S/O. KRISHNA, AGED 20 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 32-9-16, SHEELA NAGAR, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. NELLI NARESH KUMAR,, S/O. APPARAO, AGED 21 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 10-28, SREERAMNAGAR, LANKELAPALEM POST AND VILLAGE, PARAWADA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST. 3. PRAGADA MANASA,, D/O.SATYANARAYANA, AGE 25 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.2-60, DESAPATHRUNIPALEM (P & V), PARAWADA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. KARRI SRINIVASA RAO,, S/O. AMMATALLI, AGED 32 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 2-26, NEAR WATER TANK, ANAKAPALLE POST AND VILLAGE, SABBAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST. 5. Y. DEMUDU NAIDU,, S/O. DEMUDU, AGED 27 YEARS, R/O. 2-60, DESAPATRUNIPALEM POST AND VILLAGE, PARAWADA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. CHAIRMAN NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF OPEN SCHOOL NEW DELHI2 OTHER, (FORMERLY NATIONAL OPEN SCHOOL) MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, NEW DELHI, REP.BY ITS CHAIRMAN. 2 JS,J W.P.No.30776/2014 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, REGIONAL CENTRE, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF OPEN SCHOOLING, H.NO.17-26, SRINAGAR COLONY, ROAD NO.5, DILSUKHNAGAR, HYDERABAD. 3. THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF OPEN SCHOOLING, VUDA COMPLEX, SIRIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, direction or order, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not intimating the schedule of examination for secondary and senior secondary supplemental examination to enable the petitioners to submit their applications and to pay the examination fee for the academic year 2013-2014 due to which a valuable academic year would be lost for the students as illegal and unjust and to consequently direct the respondents to receive the examination fee from them now either at its Sub-Regional Office at Visakhapatnam or even at the examination centre at Rajahmundry and to allow them to write their respective examinations by allotting provisional examination numbers if necessary and to declare the examination result and to pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 38471 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass an interim direction to the respondents to receive the examination fee from them now either at its sub-regional office at Visakhapatnam or even at the examination/ study centre at Rajahmundry and to allow them to write their respective examinations by allotting provisional examination numbers if necessary and to declare the examination result for this academic year 2013- 2014 supplementary examination for secondary and senior secondary programmes during the pendency of the Writ Petition and to pass. IA NO: 4 OF 2014(WPMP 199276 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased 3 JS,J W.P.No.30776/2014 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K SARVA BHOUMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. B NARASIMHA SARMA The Court made the following ORDER: Sri T. Ramji Varma, learned counsel, appeared virtually on behalf of Sri K. Sarva Bhouma Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners and submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 17.11.2025 KAS 4 JS,J W.P.No.30776/2014 134 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 30776/2014 Dated: 17.11.2025 KAS