Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42467 (RAJ)

RAMESHCHAND S/O CHHOTELAL v. BABULAL SHARMA S/O CHHOTILAL SHARMA

CRLMP/1964/2025 · 2025-04-09

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:22474] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1964/2025 Rameshchand S/o Chhotelal, R/o House No 24 Near Shivmandir, Hasanpura, Dhanka Basti, Jaipur ----Accused Petitioner/Applicant Versus Babulal Sharma S/o Chhotilal Sharma, R/o House No 93, Hasanpura C, Kamla Nehru Nagar, Jaipur ----Complainant Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Narendra Kumar Gajua For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 28/05/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner has prepared a bankers cheque dated 12.03.2025 in favour of the complainant in compliance of the directions qua 20 percent pre- deposit at the rape of Rs. 50,000/-, howsoever, learned trial Court has rejected the same on account of delay in depositing. Considering the foregoing facts and circumstances of the case, this Court directs the learned trial Court to accept the cheque so prepared by the petitioner or a fresh cheque if the present one expires and revive the proceedings, if deposited within a period of 7 days. Failing to deposit the same within a period of seven days, the conviction order to sustain. [2025:RJ-JP:22474] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-1964/2025] Further, learned Trial Court is directed to condone the delay qua deposition, in accordance with Section 148 of Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J GAURAV/361