HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.32002 of 2025 ORDER: The present Writ Petition is filed declaring the inaction of the Respondents in regularizing the services of the Petitioners as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct Respondents to regularize Petitioners as Grade-II Supervisors with effect from the date of Petitioners appointment. 2. Initially, the Petitioners were appointed as Anganwadi workers on honorarium basis in the years 1980 to 1999 after due selection by the CDPOs concerned. While so, concerned RJDs issued notification calling applications from Anganwadi workers, who have completed 10 years of service and who have passed 10th class to the post of Supervisors Grade-II. All the Petitioners applied to the same and were selected and appointed as Contract Supervisors in the years 2003 to 2007. 3. The Petitioners had completed more than 23 years of service in the Respondent-Department. While so, Respondent No.1 had issued G.O.Ms.No.114, Finance (HR-I Plg. & Policy) Department dated 21.10.2023 based on the Andhra Pradesh Regularization of Services of Contract Employees Act, 2023 (for short, ‘Act 30 of 2023’) 2 proposing to regularize the services of the contract employees vis-à- vis the clear vacancies existing as of 02.06.2014, whereunder regularization of individuals appointed on a contract basis was to be considered provided that the final appointment was in due compliance with the procedure relating to (i) Notification of Vacancies; (ii) Selection Process; and (iii) Rule of Reservation and eligibility; age; and Educational Qualifications prescribed for the post. The Petitioners claim for regularization in terms of the ‘Act 30 of 2023’. Hence, the present Writ Petition is filed. 4. Heard Smt. A.V.S.Laxmi, learned counsel for the Petitioners and Sri S. Raju, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the Respondents. 5. The learned counsel for the Petitioners relies upon Order dated 07.04.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.8827 of 2024 and batch in support of her contentions, wherein similarly placed employees were directed to be considered for regularization. 6. The learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the cases of the Petitioners for regularization would be considered in terms of Act 30 of 2023 as per their turn and therefore he contends that the present Writ Petition is premature. 3 7. Having heard the respective counsel and considering the Order of this Court in W.P.No.8827 of 2024 dated 07.04.2025, the present Writ Petition is disposed of with the following directions; (i) The Respondent-authorities are directed to consider the case of the Petitioners for regularization in terms of the Act 30 of 2023 on par with other contract employees as expeditiously as possible. (ii) No order as to costs. 8. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 18.11.2025 KLP/CHS