ANJU KAPOOR v. STATE TH.HIGHER EDUCATION DEPTT.AND ORS.
SWP/3249/2015 · 2025-09-18
Vinod Chatterji Koul
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4246 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4246 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 33
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case: SWP No. 3249/2015
Anju Kapoor …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: None
V/s
State & Ors. ... Respondent(s) Through: Ms.Pallvi Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
ORDER 18.09.2025
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners and so was the position on the previous date of hearing as well, which suggests that either the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed or he has lost interest in prosecuting the case.
In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to seek revival/restoration of the petition, in case, cause survives.
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL)
JUDGE Jammu 18.09.2025 Suraj K Singh