Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4246 (CHH)

SMT. SATYAWATI RAJPUT v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/557/2021 · 2025-04-25

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:18869 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 557 of 2021 • Smt. Satyawati Rajput W/o Shri Balwant Singh Rajput Aged About 31 Years R/o Village Jhaphal , Tahsil Lormi, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Social Welfare, Mantralaya , Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar , Nawa Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Collector District Mungeli, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 3. Specified Officer Cum Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Lormi, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 4. Returning Officer (Panchayat) Cum Tahsildar Lormi, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 5. Presiding Officers Booth No. 301, 302, 303, 304, And 305 Of Gram Panchayat Jhaphal, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 6. Smt. Chhedin Bai Rajput W/o Rmanand Rajput Aged About 38 Years R/o Village And Post Jhaphal, Tahsil Lormi, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 7. Aditi Rajput W/o Lov Singh Rajput Aged About 22 Years R/o Village And Post Jhaphal, Tahsil Lormi, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 8. Chameli Bai Kulmitra W/o Ishwari Prasad Kulmitra Aged About 48 Years R/o Village And Post Jhaphal, Tahsil Lormi, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 9. Deepa Bai Rajput W/o Heeraram Rajput Aged About 46 Years R/o Village And Post Jhaphal, Tahsil Lormi, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 10. Durga Bai Rajput W/o Salikram Rajput Aged About 23 Years R/o Village And Post Jhaphal, Tahsil Lormi, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 11. Smt. Fulbai Rajput W/o Sadan Rajput Aged About 36 Years R/o Village And Post Jhaphal, Tahsil Lormi, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 12. Smt. Rameshwari Rajput W/o Chandrasen Rajput Aged About 41 Years R/o Village And Post Jhaphal, Tahsil Lormi, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 13. Smt. Rati Devi Rajput W/o Yogendra Rajput Aged About 30 Years R/o Village And Post Jhaphal, Tahsil Lormi, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 14. Smt. Rukhmani Rajput W/o Salikram Rajput Aged About 27 Years R/o Village And Post Jhaphal, Tahsil Lormi, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 15. Smt. Satwanti Rajput W/o Santosh Rajput Aged About 44 Years R/o Village And Post Jhaphal, Tahsil Lormi, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 16. Smt. Surastin Rajput W/o Krishna Kumar Rajput Aged About 33 Years R/o Village And Post Jhaphal, Tahsil Lormi, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Shyam Kumar, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Achyut Tiwari, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 to 3 For Respondent No. 6 : : Mr. R.S. Marhas, Additional Advocate General Mr. Rahul Pathak, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Awadh Tripathi, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 25/04/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1 That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the case of the petitioner for perusal of this Hon’ble Court. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash/set aside the impugned order dated 15.01.2021 (Annexure P-1) passed by learned Specified Officer Cum SDO (R) Lormi, District Mungeli (C.G.) in Panchayat Election Petition Case No. 08/A-89(23)/2019-20. 10.3 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue any direction, writ or order in favour of petitioner in the interest of justice. 10.4 That the cost of the petition may kindly be awarded in favour of the petitioner.” 2. At the very outset, Mr. Shyam Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, the present petition has become infructuous, therefore, this petition may be dismissed being rendered infructuous. 3. No objection from other side. 3 4. Recording the statement made by Mr. Shyam Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. 5. Interim relief, if any, granted earlier is hereby vacated. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti