Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4246 (ALL)

RAM KUMAR SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/1128/2025 · 2025-02-13

Siddhartha Varma, Y K Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:21219-DB Court No. - 39 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1128 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Kumar Sharma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd Mohiuddin Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pranjal Mehrotra Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. Case is called out in the revised list. 2. No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner even though Sri Ishan Mehta, Advocate holding brief of Sri Pranjal Mehrotra, learned counsel for the respondent is present and has informed the Court that for the same relief the petitioner had also approached the Debts Recovery Tribunal and before the Tribunal the petitioner had also asked for time to settle the matter with the financial institution. 3. In view of the information given by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Bank that the matter is also pending before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, we consider it appropriate not to interfere in the matter. 4. We are, therefore, of the view that no interference is warranted. 5. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. Order Date :- 14.2.2025 M.S. Ansari (Dr. Y.K. Srivastava,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD SAQIB ANSARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad