1 2025:CGHC:49117-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10581 of 2025 1. Jeet Ram Prajapat, S/o Chhitar Mal Prajapat, aged about 32 Years, Presently Working as Nursing Officer, R/o Khera Barhj Ramgarh, Post Narauli Dang, Gangapur, Dist- Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan)- 322203. 2. Maya Daheriya, D/o Antram Daheriya, aged about 34 Years, Presently Working as Nursing Officer R/o LIG 159 Near Radha Krishna Mandir, Tatibandh, Raipur- 492099 3. Manisha Pal, W/o Sandeep Kumar, aged about 30 Years, Presently Working as Nursing Officer R/o Shine Beauty Parlour, Near Kings and Queens School, Padum Nagar Bhilai-3 Durg- 490021 4. Kavita Krishna Kachchhap, W/o Manish Kumar, aged about 33 Years, Presently Working as Nursing Officer, R/o 1B4/7, Beside Adarsh School, 1st Floor Sector 1, Udaya Society, Tatibandh Raipur 492099. 5. Khushbulata Kunwar, D/o Late Chhagan Lal Kanwar, aged about 32 Years, Presently Working as Nursing Officer R/o Chitrakut Parishar, Harshit Nagar, Raipur 492099 6. Surya Kant, S/o Dula Ram, aged about 33 Years, Presently Working as Nursing Officer R/o EWS 778, Near Samridhi Thali, Udaya Society, Tatibandh, Raipur 492099 PRAKASH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRAKASH KUMAR Date: 2025.09.25 16:50:34 +0530 2 7. Karishma Nagar, W/o Aditya Nagar, aged about 31 Years, Presently Working as Nursing Officer R/o L I G 19, Behind Gurudwara, Tatibandh, Raipur, 492099. 8. Gulshan Kumar, S/o Khetaram, aged about 36 Years, Presently Working as Nursing Officer R/o 878, Jatiyo Ka-Rohat, Tehsil- Rohat, Dist- Pali (Rajasthan) 306421 9. Kiran, B D/o Suhasini, aged about 32 Years, Presently Working as Nursing Officer R/o Kattilthekkathil, Cheriyazheekkal PO Karunagappali, Kollam (Kerala) 690573 10. Deepak C.D., S/o Dharamajan, aged about 37 Years, Presently Working as Nursing Officer R/o H I G-95, Balaji Kewalya Park, Kumhari, Durg, Distt- Durg C.G. 490042. ... Petitioners versus 1. Union of India, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Health And Family Welfare, Government Of India, New Delhi- 110001. 2. All India Institute of Medical Science, Through Its Executive Director And C E O, All India Institute Of Medical Science, G.E. Road, Tatibandh, Raipur C.G. 492099. 3. Deputy Director, All India Institute Of Medical Science, G.E. Road, Tatibandh, Raipur C.G. 492099. 4. Medical Superintendent, All India Institute of Medical Science, G.E. Road, Tatibandh, Raipur C.G. 492099. 5. Administrative Officer (Hospital), All India Institute Of Medical Science, G.E. Road, Tatibandh, Raipur C.G. 492099. ... Respondents For Petitioners : Ms. Astha Shukla, Advocate. For Respondent No.1/Union of India : Mr. Ramakant Mishra, Deputy Solicitor General Hon'ble Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal and Hon'ble Shri Radhakishan Agrawal, JJ. Order on Board 3 (25.09.2025) Sanjay K. Agrawal, J. 1. Invoking jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners herein have filed this writ petition calling in question legality, validity and correctness of order dated 22.08.2025 (Annexure P-1), passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (for short the ‘Tribunal’), Jabalpur Bench Circuit Sitting at Bilaspur in Original Application No.O.A./819/2025, whereby the learned Tribunal has rejected the interim application filed by the petitioners. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the interim order has been granted by the Tribunal in the matter of Sashwat Upadhyay Vs. Union of India, in Original Application No.672/2014 dated 17.01.2025 which relates to the post of Assistant Administrative Officer, and in the matter of Deepti Sharma Vs. AIIMS in Original Application No.796/2025(Jabalpur), dated 22.08.2025 which relates to the post of Technical Officer (MLT), therefore, interim order may also be passed in this petition also. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent No.1 opposed the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners and submits that the challenge in the instant petition relates to the post of Senior Nursing Officer whereas the interim order has been passed in the case of post of Technical Officer, therefore, both are different. Thus, the recruitment process for the said post may not be stayed. 4 4. After having heard learned counsel for the parties, and after going through the records, we do not consider it to be a fit case to interfere with the interim order dated 22.08.2025 passed by the Tribunal. However, any promotion made during the pendency of the original application shall be subject to final outcome of the original application. 5. The Tribunal is further directed to expedite the hearing and disposal of the Original Application pending between the parties. 6. Accordingly, the instant petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Radhakishan Agrawal) Judge Judge Prakash