Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:3248 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
C482 No. 288 of 2015 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.
Mr. M.K. Ray, learned counsel for the applicant.
Mr. Deepak Bisht, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand.
2. This Criminal Misc. Application has been filed by the applicant, challenging the order dated 31.01.2015 passed by learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar in Criminal Revision No. 339 of 2014. Applicant has also challenged the order dated 13.10.2014 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar in Misc. Application No. 487 of 2014.
3. Earlier applicant filed an application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. against respondent nos. 2 to 6. Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar rejected the said application vide order dated 13.0.2014. Against the said order, applicant filed Criminal Revision. The said criminal revision has also been dismissed by 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar vide order dated 31.01.2015. Hence, this criminal misc. application.
4. Perusal of the impugned orders passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate reveals that he has considered & discussed all relevant aspects. Thus, the view taken by the
2025:UHC:3248 learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, cannot be faulted. Learned Revisional Court was thus justified in dismissing the Revision Petition. Thus, this Court does not find any reason to interfere with the impugned orders.
5. Accordingly, the criminal misc. application fails and is dismissed.
(Alok Mahra, J.)
25.04.2025 Ujjwal
2025:UHC:3248