AKASH KARMALI ALIAS AKASH KUMAR MAHLI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./634/2025 · 2025-01-29
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4245 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4245 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 634 of 2025
------
1. Akash Karmali @ Akash Kumar Mahli, aged about 22 years, son of Ramu Mahli
2. Manu Karmali, aged about 24 years, son of Bandru Karmali
3. Anuj Oraun @ Anoj Kumar Toppo, aged about 27 years, son of Bandhu Oraon All are resident of Vill-Kurbij, P.O.-Hafua, P.S.-Patratu, Dist.-Ramgarh … Petitioners
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioners : Mr. Amit Kr. Choubey, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Shashi Kr. Verma, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated- 29.01.2025
Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Patratu P.S. Case No.286 of 2024 registered under sections 109(1)/ 115(2)/117(2)/126(2)/351(2)/352/304(2)/3(5) of the B.N.S, 2023. The Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons attempted to murder the informant Shrawan Kumar causing injury on his leg which is not the vital part of the body and snatched away Rs.18,000/- from his pocket. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false. It is next submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 16 of the anticipatory bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertake to cooperate with the investigation of the case and further undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, they shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs. 10,000/- each and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.
25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Ramgarh, in connection with Patratu P.S. Case No.286 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioners will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish their mobile numbers and a copy of their Aadhar Cards in the court below with the undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the pendency of the case with further condition that they will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Sonu/Gunjan-