APHC010668712022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 39718/2022 Between: 1. GUDIPUDI PADMAVATHI, W/O. LATE. LOKAIAH, HINDU, AGE. 50 YEARS, R/O.CHAGANTIVARIPALEM (V) MUPPALLA MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE, PALNADU DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE, SATTENAPALLI DIVISION. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SATTENAPALLI RURAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SATTENAPALLI, PALNADU DISTRICT 6. RUDRAPATI RAMAKRISHNA, S/O. LATEATCHAIAH, R/O. SC COLONY, CHAGANTIVARIPALEM(VILLAGE), MUPPALLA(MANDAKAM) PALNADU (DISTRICT). 7. RUDRAPATI SANTHI, W/O RAMAKRISHNA, R/O. SC COLONY, CHAGANTIVARIPALEM(VILLAGE), MUPPALLA(MD), PALNADU (DISTRICT). 8. CHINNI, SISTER OF RUDRAPATI SANTHI, C/O RUDRAPATI RAMAKRISHNA, S/O (LATE)ATCHAIAH, SC COLONY, CHAGANTIVARIPALEM(VILLAGE), MUPPALLA(MANDAKAM) PALNADU (DISTRICT). 9. RUDRAPATI SRINIVASARAO, S/O (LATE)ATCHAIAH, SC COLONY, CHAGANTIVARIPALEM(VILLAGE), MUPPALLA(MD), PALNADU (DISTRICT). 10. RUDRAPATI PAVANI DURGA, W/O SRINIVASARAO, SC COLONY, CHAGANTIVARIPALEM(VILLAGE), MUPPALLA(MD) PALNADU (DISTRICT). 11. AKULA BHAGYA LAKSHMI, W/O SALMONRAJU, R/O. SC COLONY, CHAGANTIVARIPALEM(VILLAGE), MUPPALLA(MD), 2 PALNADU (DISTRICT) ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the in action of the respondent No. 3 to 5 in not giving protection to the petitioner to go to her own and not to take any action against the respondents 6 to 11 for threatening the petitioner and preventing her to go to her own house in D.No.6-122, Chagantivaripalem village, Muppalla Mandal, Palnadu District, and consequently directing the 2. Respondents 3 to 5 to take action the respondent No. 6 to 11 for preventing the petitioner to enter in to her house, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CHAKRAVARTHY P V S K Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief: “.... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the in action of the respondent No. 3 to 5 in not giving protection to the petitioner to go to her own and not to take any action against the respondents 6 to 11 for threatening the petitioner and preventing her to go to her own house in D.No.6-122, Chagantivaripalem village, Muppalla Mandal, Palnadu District, and consequently directing the 2. Respondents 3 to 5 to take action the respondent No. 6 to 11 for preventing the petitioner to enter in to her house, and pass ...” At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that Petitioner filed the present criminal complaint which is registered as the subject crime and in that case, she sought for police protection but Police did not prove police protection. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions would submit that unless there is any Court Order, Police cannot provide police protection to the Petitioner and would submit that this Writ Petition may be disposed of by passing appropriate orders. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Petitioner is at liberty to work out the remedy before appropriate forum according to law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 39718 of 2022 19.11.2025 Mjl /*