Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42446 (AP)

YAKASIRI SARASWATHAMMA v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/1638/2025 · 2025-12-09

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010029312025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 1638 OF 2025 Between: 1. YAKASIRI SARASWATHAMMA, W/o late Yakasiri Sankara Reddy, Aged about 70 years, House Wife, Land Lady, Senior Citizen, R/o Pranavi Residency, 12th Street, Chandramouli Nagar, Vedayapalem, Nellore City, S.P.S.R. Nellore District. ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, AP Secretariat, Velgapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 2. The Director General of Police, A.P. Police Head Quarters, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Nellore City, Nellore District 4. The Circle Inspector of Police, Vedayapalem Police station (V Town P.S) Nellore City, SPSR Nellore District. 5. Renugunta Rajasewari, W/o Renugunta Ravindra Reddy, Aged about 57 years, R/o Saritha Nivas, D.No.26-3-l632, New D.No.26-2-342, Chandramouli Nagar, 5th Street, Sri Sai Dress Materials, Nellore City, SPSRNellore Dt., CellNo.9700166001 6. Renugunta Ravindra Reddy, S/o Not known. Aged about 60 years, R/o Saritha Nivas, D.No.26-3-1632, New D.No.26-2-342, Chandramouli Nagar, 5th Street, Sri Sai Dress Materials, Nellore City, SPSRNellore Dt., Cell No.9700166001 ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue an order, direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, declaring the action of the respondents no. 3 and 4 in not registering FIR against the respondents no. 5 and 6 on the complaint made by the petitioner on 06.01.2025 as illegal, arbitrary, in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and contrary to the provisions of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and consequently a) direct the respondents no. 3 and 4 to register the FIR against the respondents no. 5 and 6 on the complaint made by the petitioner on 06.01.2025 and b) direct the respondent no. 2 to take disciplinary action against the respondents no. 3 and 4 for not acting upon the complaint dt. 06.01.2025 made by the petitioner and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents no. 3 and 4 to register the FIR against the respondents no. 5 and 6 on the complaint made by the petitioner on 06.01.2025, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: TRIMOORTHY K G Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 1638 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to to issue an order, direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, declaring the action of the respondents no. 3 and 4 in not registering FIR against the respondents no. 5 and 6 on the complaint made by the petitioner on 06.01.2025 as illegal, arbitrary, in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and contrary to the provisions of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and consequently a) direct the respondents no. 3 and 4 to register the FIR against the respondents no. 5 and 6 on the complaint made by the petitioner on 06.01.2025 and b) direct the respondent no. 2 to take disciplinary action against the respondents no. 3 and 4 for not acting upon the complaint dt. 06.01.2025 made by the petitioner and pass such…” 2. Heard Sri Trimoorthy K G, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed since the relief has become infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 10.12.2025 KKV THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO:1638 of 2025 Dated 10.12.2025 KKV HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO.: W.P. No. 1638 of 2025 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 04. 10.12.2025 Dr.VJP,J The Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. (vide separate order). ________ Dr.VJP, J KKV