Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42443 (KAR)

SHABANA CHOUDHARY v. S. SRIDHAR

CRP/151/2019 · 2025-11-04

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44475 CRP No. 151 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.151 OF 2019 (SC) BETWEEN: SHABANA CHOUDHARY W/O N A CHOUDHARY AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.241, 5TH BLOCK, KHB COLONY , KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-560 095 THROUGH HER GPA HOLDER SRI N A CHOUDARY AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS S/O M.S.DADWADKAR RESIDING AT 241, 5TH BLOCK, KHB COLONY, KORAMANGALA BANGALORE – 560 095 …PETITIONER (BY SMT.SHARANYA.H.R FOR SRI GANGADHARAIAH A N, ADVOCATES) AND: S. SRIDHAR AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS S/O SATHYANARAYANA RESIDIG AT NO.73, BTS ROAD WILSON GARDEN BANGALORE-560030 …RESPONDENT (BY SMT RACHITHA RAM FOR SRI SHRAVAN S.LOKRE, ADVOCATES) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 18 OF THE KARNATAKA SMALL CAUSES COURT ACT, 1964 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 12.02.2019 PASSED IN Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44475 CRP No. 151 of 2019 MISC.NO.15020/2015 [IN SC.NO.15409/2014] ON THE FILE OF THE FILE OF THE V ADDL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MEMBER, MACT, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MAYO HALL UNIT, BANGALORE, REJECTING THE PETITION FILED UNDER ORDER 9 RULE 13 OF CPC, SETTING ASIDE EXPARTE JUDGMENT AND DECREE ON THE FILE OF SC.NO.15409/2014 DATED 21.09.2015. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the revision petitioner has filed the Memo which reads as under: “The above named petitioner submit as follows: The petitioner is herewith withdrawing the petition as the respondent landlord agreed to return the movables taken in the Execution Petition which were in the custody of the respondent, within one week from this day and further he assured that there is no rental dues from the petitioner side. Considering the assurance given by the respondent landlord, petitioner is withdrawing the petition, hence this memo. Wherefore, the petitioner respectfully prays that, this Hon’ble Court be pleased to dismiss the above petition as withdrawn, in the interest of justice and equity.” - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44475 CRP No. 151 of 2019 2. Placing the memo on record, Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE kcm List No.: 2 Sl No.: 51