Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42441 (BOM)

KIRTIMALA AAGATRAO KALE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

/3165/2025 · 2025-09-22

Sharmila U Deshmukh, Shri M S Karnik

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

145-IA-3165-2025.doc Shailaja IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3165 OF 2025 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL [STAMP] NO.17327 OF 2025 Kirtimala Aagatrao Kale ] Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ] Respondent ….. Mr. Meghdeep Oak (through V.C.) i/b Ms. Shivani Kondekar, for Applicant. Ms. Veera Shinde, A.P.P, for Respondent – State. ….. CORAM : M.S. KARNIK & SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, JJ DATE : 22nd SEPTEMBER, 2025. P.C: 1. This is an application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal against the judgment of conviction passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Barshi, District Solapur in Sessions Case No.63 of 2021 on 5th March, 2025 by which the applicant was convicted under sections 302, 201 and 120B r/w section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. 2. Ms. Veera Shinde, learned A.P.P opposed the application by contending that delay is not properly explained. 1 of 2 SHAILAJA SHRIKANT HALKUDE Digitally signed by SHAILAJA SHRIKANT HALKUDE Date: 2025.09.23 13:05:57 +0530 145-IA-3165-2025.doc 3. However, for the reasons mentioned in paragraph 6 of the application, we are satisfied that delay of 123 days in filing the appeal needs to be condoned and hence condoned. Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 4. The application stands disposed of. [SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.] [M.S. KARNIK, J.] 2 of 2