SOHANLAL KUMAWAT S/O LATE SHRI KISHAN LAL KUMAWAT v. SAGAR SEN SON OF LATE SHRI SATYANARAYAN SEN
CW/9747/2024 · 2025-10-09
Maneesh Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42440 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42440 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:41091] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9747/2024 Sohanlal Kumawat S/o Late Shri Kishan Lal Kumawat, aged about 65 Years, R/o 544/54, Shantipura, Ajmer, District Ajmer. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Sagar Sen S/o Late Shri Satyanarayan Sen, aged about 29 Years, R/o Near L.I.C. Colony, Rajiv Colony, Vaishali Nagar, Ajmer, Working at Sagar Hair Salone, House No. 544/54 Colony, Ajmer, Working at 544/54, Shantipura, Ajmer.
2. Aakash Sain S/o Shri Om Prakash Sain, aged about 32 Years, R/o Near L.I.C. Colony, Rajiv Colony, Vaishali Nagar, Ajmer, Working at Sagar Hair Salon, House No. 544/54, Colony, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aaditya Joshi for Mr. Vikas Sharma For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 09/10/2025
1. With a limited prayer, the instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for issuing a direction to the Rent Tribunal, Ajmer to decide the pending rent eviction application submitted by the petitioner in the year 2020.
2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that an application under Section 9 of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 (for short, ‘the Act of 2001’) was submitted by the petitioner against the respondents in the year 2020 but inspite of passing of considerable time, till date, the said application has not been
[2025:RJ-JP:41091] (2 of 2) [CW-9747/2024] decided. Counsel submits that looking to the age of the petitioner, i.e. 65 years, appropriate direction be issued to the Tribunal to decide the pending application expeditiously.
3. Considering the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that the application submitted by the petitioner is pending since last more than five years and looking to the age of the petitioner i.e. 65 years, this Court deems it just and proper to issue a direction to the Rent Tribunal to decide the application (pending, if any) expeditiously.
4. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of. All pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA-17