DR. MANGUKIYA AXAY KANTHILAL, v. DR. BHAGAVAN B.C.,
CCC/395/2025 · 2025-08-22
C M Joshi
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42439 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42439 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32893-DB CCC No. 395 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 395 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
DR. MANGUKIYA AXAY KANTHILAL, S/O KANTILAL, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, UNI. REG. NO. 21MG349, R/O NO.3, WHITE HOUSE RESIDENCY, VALLABHACHARYA ROAD, HIRABAUG, VARACHA ROAD, SURAT, GUJARAT-395 006. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI ABHISHEK MALIPATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
DR. BHAGAVAN B.C, THE VICE CHANCELLOR, RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, 4TH 'T' BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 070. …ACCUSED (BY SMT. FARAH FATHIMA, ADVOCATE)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT, R/W ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN PRAYS THAT THE HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO INITIATE ACTION FOR CONTEMPT AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR HAVING DELIBERATELY AND WILLFULLY DISOBEYED THE ORDER OF THIS HON'BLE COURT DATED 12.03.2025 PASSED IN W.P.NO.6734/2025 AND FURTHER BE PLEASED TO COMPEL THE OBEDIENCE
Digitally signed by NANDINI R Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32893-DB CCC No. 395 of 2025
THEREOF, WITH SUCH APPROPRIATE AND FURTHER DIRECTIONS AS MAY BE NECESSARY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE)
1. None appears for the complainant.
2. The learned counsel for accused has filed a memo submitting that the writ appeal against the order, disobedience of which is alleged, has been allowed in favour of the accused and the said order has been set aside.
3. Hence, the present contempt petition does not survive. The same is accordingly, dismissed.
Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/- (C M JOSHI) JUDGE
tsn* List No.: 1 Sl No.: 62