VIKRAM SINGH S/O SHRI MANOHAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
SOSA/829/2025 · 2025-04-24
Ashok Kumar Jain
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42436 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42436 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:17414] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc (Interim) Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 829/2025 In S.B. Criminal Appeal No.3353/2024 Vikram Singh S/o Shri Manohar Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Tarapura, Police Station Dadiya, Tehsil Sikar, District Sikar, Presently Tenant At House No. 24, Baldev Nagar, Jhojhariyon Ki Dani, Police Station Harmada Jaipur South. ( At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Govind Prasad Rawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 24/04/2025
1. The matter is listed for interim SOS application No.829/2025 on the ground that the marriage of younger sister (Pankaj Kanwar) of applicant-Vikram Singh S/o Shri Manohar Singh is going to be solemnized on 29.04.2025.
2. Considered submissions of learned counsel appearing on behalf of applicant-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the marriage card available on record.
3. Applicant-accused Vikram Singh S/o Shri Manohar Singh was convicted by learned Special Judge (POCSO Act, Cases), Jaipur Metro-II, Jaipur on 06.09.2024 in Sessions Case No.49/2021
[2025:RJ-JP:17414] (2 of 3) [SOSA-829/2025] under Sections 5(m)/6 and under Section 67B of I.T. The maximum punishment is 20 years.
4. Having considered the fact of marriage of younger sister of applicant-accused, it is appropriate to allow interim bail for a period of two days from 28.04.2025 to 29.04.2025. Thus, the interim SOS application No.829/2025 is allowed without considering the merits of the case only on ground of marriage of applicant’s younger sister.
5. Considering each and every aspect of the matter, looking to reasons as mentioned in the application, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the considered view that the interim application for suspension of sentence of appellant- Vikram Singh S/o Shri Manohar Singh is allowed for a period two days from 28.04.2025 to 29.04.2025 provided that he would execute a personal bond in the sum of ₹1,00,000/-with two sound sureties of ₹50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge subject to the conditions indicated below:- (i) After release of appellant on bail, he will not indulge in any criminal activity and if it is found that he is involved in any criminal activity, the
order shall be recalled. (ii) That if the applicant(s) changes the place of residence, he will give in writing his changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court. (iii) Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), he will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.
[2025:RJ-JP:17414] (3 of 3) [SOSA-829/2025] (iv) That the applicant will not contact victim or any of the prosecution witnesses or their family. (v) After availing period of two days from 28.04.2025 to 29.04.2025, the applicant-accused will surrender before the Jail Authorities before 11.00 AM on 30.04.2025 and the report of surrender will be sent to the Trial Court.
6. The Trial Court is directed to send the report of surrender along with bail bonds to this Court.
7. Misc. application stands disposed of.
8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order immediately to the concerned Court.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /34