MD. HASNAIN ALAM ALIAS TINKU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./635/2025 · 2025-01-29
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4243 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4243 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 635 of 2025
------ Md. Hasnain Alam @ Tinku, aged about 37 years, son of late Hussain Ansari, resident of Village-Fitkoria, P.O. & P.S.- Bengabad, Dist.-Giridih
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Shree Nivas Roy, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Ajay Kr. Pathak, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated- 29.01.2025
Heard the parties.
Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Bengabad P.S. Case No.272 of 2022 registered under sections 406/420 of the Indian Penal Code.
The Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has cheated and committed criminal breach of trust by taking Rs.70,000/- for securing an employment of the wife of the informant. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and there is no document to show any entrustment of money to the petitioner. It is then submitted that because of personal enmity, this false story has been concocted. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the
abovenamed petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, he shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs. 20,000/- and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Giridih, in connection with Bengabad P.S. Case No.272 of 2022 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Sonu/Gunjan-