Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42427 (AP)

Rajana Srinivasa Rao, S/o Chinna Rao, v. The A.P. State Road Transport Corporation rep. by its

WP/24360/2017 · 2025-11-03

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010107332017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No: 24360 OF 2017 Between: 1. Rajana Srinivasa Rao, S/o Chinna Rao,, Staff No.E752095, D.No.32-50/1, Kotha Veedhi, 7th Ward, Narsipatnam, Vizayanagaram District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The A P State Road Transport Corporation rep by its, Vice Chairman & Managing Director, NTR Administrative Block, RTC House, Vijayawada. 2. The Chief Personal Manager APSRTC Bus Bhavan Hyderabad, - 3. The Regional Manager APSRTC Visakhapatnam Andhra Pradesh, State. ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: S A RAZAK Counsel for the Respondents: VINOD KUMAR TARLADA (SC FOR APSRTC) The Court made the following order: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.24360 OF 2017 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus or any other writ, declaring action of the respondents in not considering the petitioner for the post Record Tracer as recommended by the Medical Board, dt.09-12-2015 as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and further declare that the petitioner is entitled for the post of Record Tracer instead of Shramik, consequently direct the respondents to post the petitioner as Record Tracer in the Corporation as recommended by the Medical Board.” 2. Learned counsel representing Sri S.A.Razak, learned counsel for the Writ Petitioner appeared through Video Conference, and submitted that in the light of the earlier interim order, no further orders are required in this writ petition, and it may be closed. 3 3. Learned counsel representing Sri Vinod Kumar Tarlada, Learned Standing Counsel for respondent/APSRTC is in attendance. 4. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the writ petitioner, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 04.11.2025 PSK/KS 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 07 WRIT PETITION No:24360 OF 2017 Date: 04.11.2025 W PSK 5