RAJENDRA SINGH SON OF SHRI SHIV NARAYAN SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/14268/2025 · 2025-10-10
Ashok Kumar Jain
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42419 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42419 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:41437] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14268/2025 Rajendra Singh Son Of Shri Shiv Narayan Singh, Aged About 61 Years, R.p.s. [Dy. Commandant (Retd.)] R/o 191, Anriudh Nagar, Bharatpur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Finance (Rules), Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Secretary (Home), Ministry Of Home Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
3. A.D.G.P, (Armed Battalion), Rajasthan Police, PHQ, Lal Kothi, Jaipur (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.S. Raghav with Mr. Vishwas Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Parth Sharma for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 10/10/2025
1. The controversy in the writ petition is denial of grant of ACP on ground of censure recorded in year 2002.
2.
Learned counsel for petitioner while placing reliance upon
judgment in case of Raghuveer Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.20358/2018 submits that penalty of censure does not come in the way while consideration of candidature for grant of ACP to the petitioner by the respondents.
[2025:RJ-JP:41437] (2 of 2) [CW-14268/2025]
3.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of learned AAG candidly admits the case of present petitioner is squarely covered with
judgment in case of Raghuveer Singh Vs. State (supra) and he submits that he has no objection in case, a direction is passed for consideation of case of petitioner based on ratio in said judgment to consider case for grant of ACP to the petitioner.
4. Having considered submission of learned counsel for the parties, and also on perusal of judgment in case of Raghuveer Singh Vs. State (supra), the respondents are directed to consider case of grant of ACP to the petitioner in light of judgment as referred hereinabove. Needless to say that compliance has to be made within 60 days from date of receipt of copy of the order.
5. With aforesaid, the instant writ petition and misc. application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /51