M/S DEV CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/3524/2023 · 2025-10-17
Sanjeet Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42418 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42418 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:42835] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3524/2023 M/s Dev Construction Company, Through Proprietor Maniram S/o Sh. Sardara Ram, Aged 42 Years, R/o Dhani Puliyawali, Village Chirani, Tehsil Khetri, District Jhunjhunu-333503. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
3. Development Officer Cum Program Officer, Panchayat Samiti Khetri, District Jhunjhunu.
4. Gram Vikas Adhikari, Gram Panchayat Kharkara, Panchayat Samiti Khetri, District Jhunjhunu.
5. Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Kharkara, Panchayat Samiti Khetri, District Jhunjhunu.
6. M/s Suresh Construction Company, Through Its Proprietor Suresh Kumar S/o Ran Singh, Village Rambaas, Post Lalamandi, Tehsil Buhana, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahendra Singh Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Dy. G.C., Mr. Sandeep Singh Nirwan, Mr. Sanjay Bharati HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT
Order 17/10/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the security deposit amount has already been refunded by the respondents to the petitioner. No further adjudication in the present writ petition is required. In view of the above, the present writ petition has become infructuous and is accordingly dismissed. Stay application and pending application, if any, also stand
disposed of.
(SANJEET PUROHIT),J TN/66