[2025:RJ-JP:35687] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11044/2025 Smt. Priyanka @ Pinki W/o Rajkumar, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Panjupura, Thana Kanchanpur, District Dholpur, Present Ramsingh Jatav Ka Makan, Adarsh Colony Shikarganj, Karauli, Present Tenant E0017 Ground Floor Ghar Aangan Society Hajyawala, Thana Muhana, District Jaipur. (Accused In Present Confined Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bhanu Prakash Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 04/09/2025 1. Instant application for bail is filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the petitioner-accused Smt. Priyanka @ Pinki W/o Rajkumar in FIR No.778/2025 dated 28.07.2025 registered at P.S. Muhana, District – Jaipur City (South), whereby the petitioner-accused has charged under Sections 127(2), 115(2) and 308(5) of BNS, 2023. 2. The petitioner was arrested and is in judicial custody since her arrest. The Court below has dismissed the bail application. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the petitioner is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. Learned [2025:RJ-JP:35687] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11044/2025] counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a female and when the complainant has visited her place, the people in the vicinity came and they started beating petitioner accused and complainant. He further submitted that other persons have prepared video and there is no demand of money. He submits that this is not a case of extortion rather a false case is registered against the petitioner accused by the complainant after exploiting petitioner accused. He also submitted that the petitioner accused is mother of two children and there is no criminal antecedents against the petitioner accused. He also submitted that the trial will take time and no purpose will be served by keeping the petitioner-accused in custody. 4. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record. 6. On basis of complaint lodged by complainant Rahul Saini about invitation to her flat by present petitioner accused in the night of 26.07.2025 and further demand of ₹1,00,000/- and on non-payment implication in a false case, a case is registered and matter is investigated. During investigation, the petitioner-accused is arrested and she is in custody. There is no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and she is a female. 7. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the petitioner-accused is no more required in the investigation and she is in custody for quite some [2025:RJ-JP:35687] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11044/2025] time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the petitioner-accused. 8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of petitioner- accused is hereby allowed and the petitioner-accused Smt. Priyanka @ Pinki W/o Rajkumar is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The petitioner-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The petitioner-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The petitioner-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the petitioner-accused shall be liable to be cancelled. 9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/177