Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42415 (ALL)

UMA SHANKAR CHAMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

NA529/931/2025 · 2025-04-27

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:64980 Court No. - 80 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 931 of 2025 Applicant :- Uma Shankar Chamar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Bhagyawati Verma,Dinesh Kumar Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the S.S.T. No. 132 of 2022 arising out of case crime no. 59 of 2022, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 427 IPC, Police Station- Mungra Badshahpur, District- Jaunpur pending in the Court of Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Jaunpur expeditiously within stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is the informant in the said session trial and the opposite party nos. 2 to 5 are the accused persons. It is further submitted that charges have been framed and now the case is listed for recording the evidence. It is also submitted that the opposite party nos.2 to 5 are not cooperating with the Court concerned and are adopting delaying tactics in disposal of the said case and only dates are being fixed in the matter. The Court concerned is not taking proper interest in disposal of the said session trial. 4. Learned AGA opposed the prayer. 5. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 6. The applicant before this Court is the informant of the case and since the case is fixed for evidence and normally it starts with the deposition of P.W.1/ informant, who himself is appearing before this Court seeking relief for expeditious disposal of the case. 7. In the circumstances, the applicant is directed to appear before the trial Court on the date fixed for the case for recording of his own evidence which shall be recorded by the learned trial Court without any delay as the case is pending since 2022 and then thereafter all endeavour shall be made for expeditious disposal of the case. 8. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 9. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 28.4.2025 Fhd Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad