Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42413 (RAJ)

DR. JEETENDRA SINGH S/O TANWAR SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/9053/2025 · 2025-09-25

Maneesh Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:39566] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9053/2025 1. Dr. Jeetendra Singh S/o Tanwar Singh, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Tahsil Mangrol Bohat District Baran Rajasthan. 2. Monika D/o Rampal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Kakra Road, Kishangarh Basalwar Rajasthan 3. Nivedita Bhargava D/o Satish Bhargava, Aged About 27 Years, R/o 53 Ward No. 6 Pratap Nagar Ii Chhabra District Baran Rajasthan 4. Chetanay Kumar Nahar S/o Ashok Kumar Nahar, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Balaji Choraha Mohan Takji Road Bhawanimandi Jhalawar Rajasthan. 5. Dr. Deepa Sharma W/o Chandra Parkash Sharma, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Chitragupt Nagar-I Imli Phatak, Jaipur Rajasthan. 6. Monika Rathore D/o Narendra Singh Rathore, Aged About 47 Years, R/o 100, A-13 Ashok Vihar, Near Haldiram Pyao Bikaner Rajasthan. 7. Ved Parkash Dhakar S/o Shri Debi Lal Dhakar, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Inside Kalijari Gate Ward No.25, Dhakad Mohalla Tahsil Shahpura Bhilwada Rajasthan. 8. Sunita Meena D/o Lalit Kishor Meena, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 257, Saraswati Vihar Ward No. 12 Meeno Ka Mohlla Sirsi Jaipur Rajasthan. 9. Pawan Kumar Nainawat S/o Shri Prakash Chand Balai, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Vpo Kuhada Ward No.3 Kuhada Jaipur Rajasthan. 10. Dr. Mukesh Kumar Gupta S/o Shri Babu Lal Agarwal, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Ward No. 19 Nehru Colony Lalsot Dausa Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Commissioner, College Education, Shiksha Sankul, Jln Marg, Jaipur. 3. Principal, Government Girls College, Chhabra, Baran Rajasthan. 4. Principal, Government Girls College, Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan. 5. Principal, Government College, Chhabra, Baran Rajasthan. 6. Principal, Government College, Chomahla Jhalawar Rajasthan. 7. Principal, Government Girls College, Lawan, Dausa Rajasthan. [2025:RJ-JP:39566] (2 of 3) [CW-9053/2025] 8. Principal, Shree Pratap Singh Barhat Government College, Shahpura, Bhilwada, Rajasthan 9. Principal, Mangilal Bagdi Government College, Nokha, Bikaner Rajasthan. 10. Principal, Government Collage, Kallawas Lalsot Dausa Rajasthan. 11. Principal, Government Girls Collage, Mandawari Dausa Rajasthan. 12. Principal, Government Girls Collage, Mandawari Dausa Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mithun Bhai Chaturvedi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Surendra Singh Naruka, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 25/09/2025 1. Learned counsel for the parties are in agreement that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the decision of a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 28.08.2023 passed in the matter of Ram Chaturvedi & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.1. and later on, affirmed by a Division Bench of this Court in a bunch of special appeal writ led by State of Rajasthan vs. Ram Chaturvedi & Ors.2 with the following modifications:- (1) The respondents/original petitioners/applicants are entitled to continue on their respective posts till they are replaced by existing regular employees or regularly selected candidates through RPSC. (2) The respondents/original petitioners/applicants would be continued on their posts provided that sufficient number of students are available for the particular course(s) for which they were appointed. (3) The respondents/original petitioners/applicants would be entitled to honorarium at the rate of Rs.800/- per hour as is being paid to them presently or as may be modified by the State from time to time. Therefore, they prayed that the writ petition be decided and disposed of in a similar terms. 1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1474/2023 2 D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.903/2023 [2025:RJ-JP:39566] (3 of 3) [CW-9053/2025] 2. In view of the above consensus, the present petition is disposed of in terms of the directions issued in Ram Chaturvedi (Supra) as modified in State of Rajasthan vs. Ram Chaturvedi & Ors. (Supra). 3. The petitioner shall be entitled for the same benefits which have been granted in the aforesaid judgment delivered by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Ram Chaturvedi (Supra) as modified in State of Rajasthan vs. Ram Chaturvedi & Ors. (Supra). 4. Stay application as well as all other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA-14