Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42408 (RAJ)

KAMLESH YADAV S/O SURAJMAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/574/2025 · 2025-01-31

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:4478] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 574/2025 Kamlesh Yadav S/o Surajmal, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Khejroli P.S. Govindgarh, District Jaipur Rural. (At Present In Central Jail Dausa). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 31/01/2025 1. This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 arising out of F.I.R. No.369/2024, registered with the Police Station Lalsot, District Dausa for the offences under Sections 303(2), 309(4), 121(1), 132 & 352 of the BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been implicated in this case merely because he was present on the spot at the time of alleged incident and there was some scuffle between the team of the transport authority and some vehicle drivers. Counsel further submits that the petitioner is behind the bars since 24.12.2024 and no recovery has been effected at his instance. Learned counsel also submits that the co-accused in this case, namely, Suresh has already been enlarged on bail and the [2025:RJ-JP:4478] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-574/2025] case of present petitioner is on same footing, therefore, he may be released on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application. 4. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record. 5. Having regard to the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner so also the allegations levelled against the petitioner as well as the fact that the he is behind the bars since 24.12.2024 and more particularly the co-accused in this case has already been enlarged on bail, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before the trial Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /406