Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42405 (AP)

A.Trimurti Naidu, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/7351/2016 · 2025-12-23

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010450432016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 7351/2016 Between: 1. A.TRIMURTI NAIDU,, S/O. KRISHNA MURTHY, AGE 41 YEARS, PET PALLI VILLAGE, DONKINARALASA (POST) VIZAYA NAGARAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH- 535558 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY(T.W)SOCIAL WELFARE (T.W.SER.III) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. A P TRIBAL WELFARE RESIDENTIAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS, SOCIETY(GURUKULAM). 2ND FLOOR, DSS BHAVAN, MASABTANK, HYDERABAD REP.BY THE MEMBER SECTETARY. 3. THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS, A.P. TRIBAL WELFARE RESIDENTIAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS SOCIETY (GURUKULAM), 2ND FLOOR, DSS BHAVAN, MASABTANK, HYDERABAD REP.BY THE CHAIRMAN. 4. SRI G GANESH, S/O RAMS RAO, 44YEARS, APTWRSCHOOL(B), G.MADUGALA, VIZAG (DIST) 5. M SRINIVASA RAO, S/O.RAMI NAIDU, AGE 44YEARS, APTWRSCHOOL(BOYS), P.KONAVALASA, VIZAYA NAGARAM DISTRICT 2 6. B KAILASARAO, S/O.(KRISHNAMURTHY), AGE 43 YEARS, APTWRSCHOOL(PTG-B), MALLI, SRIKAKULAM(DIST) ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in not giving promotion to the petitioner for the post of post Graduate Teacher (Science) on par with his juniors in spite of he is eligible and qualified to hold the post of post Graduate Teacher (Science) as on the date of promotions and not considering the representation of the Petitioner dt 22-1-2016 is illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of Art 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consquently declare that the petitioner is eligible and qualified to hold the post of post Graduate Teacher(Science) along with juniors with all consequential including seniority and increments IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 9389 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to consider the case of the Petitioner to promote as Post Graduate Teacher(Science) by dispose of the representation dated 22-1-2016 forthwith pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SURESH KUMAR POTTURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE (AP) 2. RAVI KUMAR PONAKAMPALLI The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following main prayer: “ to issue order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in not giving promotion to the petitioner for the post of post Graduate Teacher (Science) on par with his juniors in spite of he is eligible and qualified to hold the post of post Graduate Teacher (Science) as on the date of promotions and not considering the representation of the Petitioner dated 22-1-2016, as illegal, arbitrary and to pass….” 2. No representation for the petitioner. 3. While the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms. T. Lakshmi Padmaja, learned Standing Counsel for the 2nd respondent, has passed on the proceedings dated 19.02.2019 issued by the Secretary (FAC), Gurukulam, Amaravathi, A.P., whereunder the petitioner, placed at Sl. No. 10, namely Sri A. Trimurti Naidu, was promoted as Junior Lecturer in the time scale of pay of Rs. 37,100–91,450/- (as per RPS, 2015). Further, the learned Standing Counsel for the 2nd respondent has passed on the proceedings dated 11.06.2024 issued by the Project Officer & Additional District Magistrate, ITDA, Parvathipuram, stating that the petitioner died on 06.05.2021 while he was in service. It is also stated that the petitioner’s wife, 4 namely Smt. Rowthu Priyanka, was appointed as Junior Assistant in the 2nd respondent Society under the compassionate category. 4. Copies of the proceedings dated 19.02.2019 and 11.06.2024, passed on by the learned Standing Counsel for the 2nd respondent, are taken on record and made part of the Court record. 5. Recording the said submissions, this Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 24.12.2025 PNS