JITENDRA PARIHAR S/O SHRI SATYANARAYAN PARIHAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/19593/2025 · 2025-12-18
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42394 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42394 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:51380] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19593/2025 Jitendra Parihar S/o Shri Satyanarayan Parihar, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Ratioyon Ki Dhani Bhopalgarh, District Jodhpur (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Finance Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Commissioner, College Education, Commissionerate, Jaipur (Raj.).
3. Principal, Govt. Girls College, Pipar City, District Jodhpur.
4. Chairman, Govt. Girls College, Pipar City, District Jodhpur.
5. Joint Director, College Education, Commissionerate, College Education Rajasthan, Jaipur.
6. Principal, Dr. B.r. Ambedkar Govt. College, Sriganganagar.
7. Rajkiya Mahavidyalaya Vikas Samiti, Sriganganagar (Raj.) Through Its President. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sribhan Gurjar For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 18/12/2025
1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer:
“by way of writ, order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed reinstate the petitioner to the post of Computer Operator.”
2.
Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 13.04.2015 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4559/2013 titled as Harendra Singh Jhala and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled
[2025:RJ-JP:51380] (2 of 2) [CW-19593/2025] by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order.
3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be disposed in light of Harendra Singh Jhala and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra).
4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Harendra Singh Jhala and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra), but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E- mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
5. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioner, then same benefits be extended.
6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /502