AVDHESH KUMAR DOHARE S/O RAMJEET v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/16051/2025 · 2025-10-17
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42382 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42382 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:42862] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16051/2025 Avdhesh Kumar Dohare S/o Ramjeet, Aged About 54 Years, R/o F-88, Pathwari And Arunoday School Ke Pass, Malan, Subhash Nagar, Bhilwara, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Government Secretariat Ra- jasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. The Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.
3. The District Education Officer, Elementary Education (Headquarter), Bhilwara.
4. The District Election Officer (Collector), Bhilwara.
5. The Election Registration Officer (Sdm), Bhilwara, District Bhilwara. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 17/10/2025
1.
Learned counsel for petitioner while referring order dated 01.09.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13194/2025 Kuldeep Singh Bansiwal Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., Order dated 04.09.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13367/2025 (Bharat Singh Yadav Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.) and
order dated 23.09.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14524/2025 (Vinita Kumari Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors.) and submits that the controversy raised herein is squarely
[2025:RJ-JP:42862] (2 of 2) [CW-16051/2025] covered by an order passed by a Co-ordinate bench of this Hon’ble Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in case of Ten Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12975/2025) and accordingly this writ petition be disposed of.
2. Having considered the submission of learned counsel for pe- titioner and on perusal of judgment in case of Ten Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra) and followed in subsequently de- cided case, this writ petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation within a period of 4 weeks from today.
3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a fresh representation to respondents within a period of four weeks raising all grounds. The respondents are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 4 weeks from date of receipt of representation, in light of ratio laid down in case of Ten Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra). After passing the order, the respon- dents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the pe- titioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he will have a right to re-approach the Court with fresh petition.
4. Accordingly, this writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /72