Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10584 of 2025 1 - Rajaram Verma S/o Ramadhar Verma Aged About 40 Years Posted As Panchayat Secretary At Village Panchayat Karri And Additional Charge Gram Panchayat Balangi, Janpad Panchayat Wadrafnagar, R/o Vill- Karri, Dist- Balrampur Ramanujganj (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development At Mahanadi Bhawan Naya, Raipur Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Directorate Of Panchayat And Rural Development Indravati Bhawan, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, Dist- Raipur Chhattisgarh, 3 - Deputy Director Panchayat, Balrampur, District- Balrampur- Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh, 4 - Chief Executive Officer Dist- Panchayat, Balrampur, Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh,
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudhanshu Upadhyay, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Khulesh Sahu, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble
Shri Justice R
avindra Kumar Agrawal, J.
Order on Board 12/09/2025
1. The petitioner, who is working as Panchayat Secretary has been transferred from Village Panchayat Rameshpur, Janpad Panchayat Wadrafnagar to Village ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.09.12 19:02:07 +0530
2 Panchayat Jawrahi, Janpad Panchayat Wadrafnagar and from Village Panchayat Karri and additional charge village Panchayat Balangi, Janpad Panchayat Wadrafnagar, Dist- Balrampur-Ramanujganj to Village Panchayat Rameshpur Janpad Panchayat Wadrafnagar vide transfer order dated 20.08.2025 and 25.07.2025.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that against the said transfer
order the petitioner wants to move representation before the transfer authority, therefore, he may be permitted to avail the remedy of representation before the concerned authority.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the State has not raised any objection on the
submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents annexed with the writ petition.
5. Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to move his representation before the respondent No.4 within a week and in the eventuality of filing the representation within a week from today by the petitioner, respondent No.4 is directed to consider and decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
6. The petitioner is directed to produce a copy of this order within a week from today before respondent No.4.
7. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation and direction. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok