HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12753/2025 Hasan Usman S/o Abdul Rahim, R/o Ravan Ka Maidan, Near The Masjid, Ward No. 04, Naseerabad, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Union Of India, Through The Director General Defense Estate, Ministry Of Defense, Raksha Sampada Bhawan, Ulaan Baatar Marg, Delhi Cantt- 110010 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Cantonment Board, Nasirabad, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anirudh Tyagi & Mr. Saurabh Vaishnav for Mr. Sunil Tyagi JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 25/08/2025 1. By way of filing this writ petition, a challenge has been led to the impugned notice dated 12.08.2025 issued by the respondents by which the petitioner has been asked to remove his encroachment from the subject land. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a license was granted to the grandfather of the petitioner to run the business of leather on the subject land and on the basis of the same, the petitioner is doing the said business, but without following the due process of law the notice has been issued to the petitioner for his ejectment from the subject land. Learned counsel submits that a detailed representation to the aforesaid notice has already been submitted in the office of the respondents by the petitioner on (2 of 2) [CW-12753/2025] 18.08.2025, but no heed has been paid, hence interference of this Court is warranted. 3. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on record. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. In case, representation (pending, if any) submitted by the petitioner, it is expected from the authorities concerned to look into the matter and pass reasoned and speaking order, expeditiously as early as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 6. For a period of four weeks, no coercive action be taken against the petitioner. 7. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not issued any order/direction to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner in a particular way. They would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/18