Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr. Appeal No.481 of 2025 Date of Decision: 28.07.2026 _______________________________________________________ Rajesh Kumar Rana
…….Appellant
Versus Anoop Kumar
… Respondent
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1
For the Appellant: Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):
Learned counsel for the parties are in agreement that in terms of provision contained under Section 413 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and judgment passed by Hon’ble Apex Court in Mallikarjun Kodagali (Dead) represented through Legal Representatives Vs. State of Karnataka and Others, (2019) 2 SCC 752, a complainant being aggrieved by dismissal of his/her complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act is required to file an appeal before learned District & Sessions Judge.
2.
In view of the above, Registry is directed to transfer the case at hand to the Court of learned District & Sessions Judge,
1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
Kangra at Dharamshala, Himachal Pradesh, forthwith enabling afore Court to proceed with the matter in accordance with law. However, while doing the needful in terms of directions contained in the instant
order, Registry may retain photocopy of the petition along with the documents annexed thereto for the record.
3.
Learned counsel for the parties undertake to cause appearance of their respective clients before the learned District & Sessions Judge, Kangra at Dharamshala, Himachal Pradesh, on 20.08.2026, enabling it to proceed with the matter in accordance with law. Record of the Court below be sent back forthwith.
(Sandeep Sharma),
Judge July 28, 2026 (sunil)