Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010030392025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 1737/2025 Between:
1. SHAIK ABDULLA, S/O LATE DASTAGIRI, AGED 38 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O KRISHNAPURAM VILLAGE, H/O BUDAWADA VILLAGE, MARRIPADU MANDAL, S.P.S.R. NELLORE DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT AT NELLORE.
3. THE MANDAL PRAJA PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, MARRIPADU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT
4. THE BUDAWADA GRAM PANCHAYAT, MARRIPADU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY.
5. THE SECRETARY, BUDAWADA GRAM PANCHAYAT, MARRIPADU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
6. SHAIK BIBI JOHN, W/O KHALEESHA, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O B.C. COLONY, KRISHNAPURAM VILLAGE, BUDAVADA PANCHAYATH, MARRIPADU MANDAL, S.P.S.R.
NELLORE DISTRICT.
2
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. D LOKANADHAM Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV
2. MATTEGUNTA. SUDHIR, STANDING COUNSEL FOR Z.P.PS, M.P.PS, GRAM PANCHAYATS The Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER:
No representation for the Writ Petitioner.
2. Sri Panku Rajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Sri Vidya Sagar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Sudhir Mattegunta, learned Standing Counsel for Gram Panchayat are present.
3. This Writ Petition was listed on 10.02.2025, 03.03.2025, and again on
07.03.2025. On all three occasions, there was no representation on behalf of the Writ Petitioner. Having noted the same, on 07.03.2025, this Court listed the matter today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the Writ Petitioner.
4. In this view of the matter, this Writ Petition is dismissed for Non- prosecution. No order as to costs.
5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 17.03.2025 DSV