Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42360 (AP)

A. Rajasekhar, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/17304/2017 · 2025-11-13

Battu Devanand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010619532017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] FRIDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO: 17304/2017 Between: 1. A. RAJASEKHAR,, S/O LATE GOPAL SETTY, AGED 54 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO.16/93, OLD BUS STAND, DHARMAVARAM TOWN, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DHARMAVARAM POLICE STATION, DHARMAVARAM, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DHARMAVARAM POLICE STATION, DHARMAVARAM, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 5. B LAKSHMI DEVAMMA, W/O. B. SIVA PRASAD, AGED 55 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.16/92, OLD BUS STAND, DHARMAVARAM TOWN, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 6. B KALAVATHI, W/O. B. VIJAY KUMAR, AGED 51 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.16/92, OLD BUS STAND, DHARMAVARAM TOWN, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus challenging the actior respondents no. 3 and 4 in interfering 2 into civil disputes between the petitiont.. _ and the respondents no. 5 and 6 and directing the petitioner to evict from the Shop bearing D.No.16/93 and Two Go-down rooms bearing D.No.16/92 situated at old bus stand, Dharmavaram town, Anantapur as illegal, arbitrary and also violation of principles of natural justice and also lack of jurisdiction and consequently direct the respondents Police not to interfere into the civil disputes between the petitioner and respondents no.5 and 5 with regard to the above property in any manner and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'bie Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 21152 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents Police authorities not to interfere into the civil disputes between the petitioner and respondents no.5 and 6 with regard to Shop bearing D.No.16/93 and Two Go-down rooms bearing D.No.16/92 situated at old bus stand, Dharmavaram town, Anantapur in any manner pending disposal of thr writ petition and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant leave for filling the counter affidavit on behalf of the respondent No. 5 in W.P.No.17304 of 2017 and Pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant leave to receive the Counter affidavit copies filed by Respondent No.3 on record by allowing the leave petition in the above writ petition in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N ASWARTHA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. BANDI SRIHARI 3. MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO.17304 of 2017 ORDER: Mr.S.Mahendra, learned counsel, representing Mr.N.Aswartha Narayana, learned counsel for the petitioner on record would submit that dispute between the petitioner and respondent Nos.5 and 6 is settled before the Lok-Adalat and as such, no further adjudication is required in the present Writ Petition and sought to close the same. 2. The statement of the learned counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. 3. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND Date:14.11.2025 JLV 4 23 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO.17304 of 2017 Dt.14.11.2025 JLV