[2025:RJ-JP:19103] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2673/2025 Vasu @ Virendra Singh Rathore Son Of Shri Hem Singh Rathore, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 84, Vaishali City, Meenawala, Panchyawala, Sirsi Road, Jaipur Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Ajay Kumar Meena Son Of Shri Raju Meena, Aged About 21 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 13-14, Raj Vihar Colony, Meenawala, Sirsi Road, Police Station Karni Vihar, Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7679/2023 Rudra Pratap Singh S/o Virendra Singh, Aged About 17 Years, Minor Through Natural Guardian Father Virendra Singh S/o Ganpat Singh, Aged 43 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 56, Ranjeet Nagar, Khatipura, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Ajay Meena S/o Shri Raju Meena, Aged About 19 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 13-14, Raj Vihar Colony, Meenawala, Sirsi Road, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Santosh Singh Shekhawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Yash Vardhan Singh Bhati HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 06/05/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:19103] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-2673/2025] 1. The instant petitions have been filed under Section 528 of BNSS for quashing the FIR No. 635/2023, registered at Police Station Karni Vihar, District Jaipur City (West) for offences under Sections 143, 323 and 341 of IPC and Sections 3(1)(a) and 3(2) (va) of SC/ST Act, on the basis of compromise entered between the parties. 2. Learned counsel for Respondent No.2 concedes that the petitioners and respondent No.2 have entered into compromise which bears their signatures vide Annexure-2. It is also contended that this Court verifies the contents of the compromise entered between the parties and the complainant admitted the fact of entering into compromise with the petitioners. The dispute between the parties has already been resolved, therefore, considering the above facts, if the FIR and subsequent proceeding is quashed then the complainant has no objection. 3. Heard and perused the material available on record. 4. Considering the fact that the parties have agreed upon to enter into compromise and it bears the signature of the complainant and the dispute between the parties is inter-se and does not affect the society at large, this Court placing reliance upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab [(2012) 10 SCC 303] and Ramgopal Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh reported in 2022 (14) SCC 531, this Court deems it just and proper to allow the present petition. 5. Considering the aforementioned, the present criminal miscellaneous petitions are allowed on the ground of compromise entered between the parties and the FIR No. 635/2023, registered [2025:RJ-JP:19103] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-2673/2025] at Police Station Karni Vihar, District Jaipur City (West) with all consequential proceedings, are hereby quashed and set aside qua the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the instant petitions are allowed. 7. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J MAHIMA /41-42