1 2025:CGHC:6653 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 466 of 2025 1 - Rajkamal Kore S/o Shri Dharmendra Kore Aged About 30 Years R/o Village- Kahadkasa, Post- Amatola, Tahsil- Ambagarh Chowki, District- Mohla- Manpur- Ambagarh Chowki (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.). 2 - The Commissioner Directorate Health Services, Indravati Bhawan, Third Floor, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.). 3 - The Director Directorate, Health Bhawan, Near Gst Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.). 4 - The Collector Mungeli, District- Mungeli (C.G.). 5 - The Chief Medical And Health Officer Ramgarh Mungeli, District- Mungeli (C.G.). 2 6 - The Block Medical Officer Community Health Centre, Lormi, District- Mungeli (C.G.). 7 - The In-Charge Rural Health Coordinator, Sub Health Centre Chhaparva Community Health Centre Lormi, District- Mungeli (C.G.). ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bharat Rajput, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/ State : Mr. Kanwaljeet Singh Saini, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 05/02/2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set-aside the impugned order/memo dated 09.12.2024 passed by the respondent no. 5 and further may kindly be direct to the concerned respondent authority to pay the salary of petitioner from month of Sept. 2024 and further pay the salary of petitioner to continue, in the interest of justice. 10.2 That this Hon'ble court further may kindly be pleased to direct to the concerned respondent to pay the interest of the non-paying the salary of petitioner, in the interest of 3 justice. 10.3 That, any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including award of the costs of the petition may be given.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has been paid salary from the month of September, 2024 to January, 2025 as such his grievance has been redressed and this petition has become infructuous. 3. No objection has been raised from other side. 4. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as having infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat